Skip to content
DHWNEWS
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
Menu

River Thames Scheme mid project review

Posted on May 31, 2026 by ecwlarcombe

Extract from the Environment Agency update (May 2026)
Background
In late autumn 2024, project sponsors the Environment Agency and Surrey County Council commissioned a mid-project review of the River Thames Scheme (RTS). The review was to ensure that this nationally important infrastructure project (as determined by the Secretary of State in December 2020) remained efficient, cost-effective and aligned with long-term goals. It was also to ensure the project provides the flood risk benefits in a strong and sustainable manner.

During the review, we paused most activity not directly related to the review.

Review aims and conclusions
The mid-project review had two elements. Firstly, to assess whether the proposed solution of a new channel and weir improvements remains the best option in terms of cost-effectiveness and viability. The second was to examine whether organisationally the RTS team was set up in the best way to complete a project of this scale and complexity. The government’s Infrastructure Projects Authority (IPA), now the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority, carried this out independently.

The review has now ended and has confirmed that channels with weir improvements is still the best option for reducing flood risk. This is excellent news and RTS will proceed on this basis with no changes required to the design of the flood defences.

The IPA highlighted some changes to how the project is being managed, to improve efficiency. The Environment Agency and Surrey County Council are currently working through and implementing these recommendations to ensure RTS has the best organisational structure and processes in place for remobilisation. This post-review ‘reset’ is ongoing.

At the same time, the RTS team is updating the RTS outline business case to ensure consistency with the new Defra partnership funding policy which became effective in April.

After May 2027, and as a result of the local government reorganisation programme, the Environment Agency will be working with West Surrey and East Surrey councils.

With any large-scale project such as RTS, it does take some time to carry out a wide-ranging review and assure the work that has been carried out. We understand the frustration felt by all those who have been impacted by flooding in the past and want to see RTS completed as soon as possible.


The EA source document can be found here

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • River Thames Scheme mid project review
  • Internal audit: Understanding the Parish Council AGAR
  • Open letter to Datchet Parish Council
  • Black Potts footbridge – about to collapse – spot the difference
  • Black Potts timber footbridge – unusable but still standing

DATCHET

The name "Datchet" is thought to be Celtic in origin, and the last part may be related to cet ("wood"). In the Domesday Book it is called "Daceta".lla. Datchet is first mentioned between 990 and 994, when King Ethelred made small grants of land here.

HORTON

The village name "Horton" is a common one in England. It is Old English in origin and derives from the two words horu 'dirt' and tūn 'settlement, farm, estate', presumably meaning 'farm on muddy soil'.In the Domesday Book of 1086 it was recorded as Hortune.

WRAYSBURY

The village name was traditionally spelt Wyrardisbury; it is Anglo Saxon in origin and means 'Wïgrǣd's fort'. Its name is recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086 as Wirecesberie and as Wiredesbur in 1195. The name is seen again as Wyrardesbury in 1422.

©2026 DHWNEWS | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme